RAC claim six in 10 drivers want to see 'noise camera' rollout

The survey was taken by the Bristol-based motoring organisation following a trial in South Gloucestershire, Bradford, Great Yarmouth, and Birmingham

Author: Oliver MorganPublished 17th Aug 2023
Last updated 29th Jun 2024

New research by the Bristol-based RAC has revealed the majority of drivers (58%) would be 'in favour' of so-called 'noise cameras', following a trial which has taken place in four locations across the country - including in South Gloucestershire.

The technology automatically detects vehicles with illegally loud exhausts, or whose engines are unnecessarily rolled out.

The 'noise cameras' can pinpoint them thanks to a number of microphones, and hand the details of the vehicle on to the police, who can then plant the motorist with an on-the-spot £50 fine.

Currently, the limit which triggers the 'noise cameras' is set at 74db.

According to the survey, as conducted by the RAC, approximately six in 10 drivers said they would be in favour of a wider rollout once the findings of the Department for Transport’s £300,000 trials, which began last October, are revealed.

Only a fifth (22%) were against the idea, with a similar proportion (20%) unsure.

In addition to the trial in South Gloucestershire, they have also taken place in Bradford, Great Yarmouth, and Birmingham.

RAC head of policy Simon Williams said: “Our research with drivers shows there is a very strong desire to put an end to the scourge of excessively noisy vehicles that disturb the peace all around the country.

“It’s plain wrong that those who have fitted their cars with modified exhausts, some motorbike riders and supercar owners can currently just get away with making an unacceptable amount of noise. Fortunately, the Department for Transport’s recent noise camera trials may provide the solution. We hope the findings are positive and that the technology can be quickly and cost-efficiently rolled out to the worst affected areas.

“There is no good reason why cars and motorbikes should make so much noise, so the sooner effective camera enforcement can be put in place the better.”

A third (34%) of those who took part in the RAC study said they regularly hear loud revving engines or excessively loud exhausts, which rose to nearly half of drivers in London (47%) and to 40% in Wales and Scotland.

Half of all drivers (51%) questioned said they occasionally hear one or more vehicles with particularly loud exhausts.

Asked for their opinions about whether the current £50 on-the-spot fine for a vehicle breaching the 74-decibel limit is appropriate, Four-in-10 (39%) felt the fine had been set at the right level whereas 37% disagreed, and a quarter (24%) were undecided.

Of those who felt the fine wasn’t severe enough, 43% thought it should carry a £200 fine and a driving ban until the exhaust was found to comply with the legal decibel limit. Among Londoners this shot up to more than two-thirds (67%).

Road noise is known to contribute to health problems, such as heart attacks, strokes and dementia, yet there is no requirement for MOT testers to use decibel meters to check exhaust noise levels.

The Government estimates the annual social cost of urban road noise, including lost productivity from sleep disturbance and health costs, is up to £10bn.

Roads Minister Richard Holden said: “Boy racers are an anti-social menace and we have extensively trialled noise camera technology in various parts of the country over the past year.

“We are currently analysing data from the trials and will update in due course on any future measures which will help bring peace and tranquillity back to our towns, cities and villages.”

The London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea was the first local authority to trial acoustic cameras in May 2022.

Read more: Noise reduction trials to begin to combat ‘boy racers’

First for all the latest news from across the UK every hour on Hits Radio on DAB, at hitsradio.co.uk and on the Rayo app.