Alistair Carmichael tells court he regrets involvement in leak of memo
Former Scottish secretary Alistair Carmichael has told a court he "enormously'' regrets his involvement in the leaking of a confidential memo. The Liberal Democrat MP made the statement as he gave evidence for a second day at a special Election Court sitting in Edinburgh. During the hearing, he also admitted he tried to mislead a Cabinet Office probe into the leak. But the Orkney and Shetland MP denied lying about his role in the release of the document to protect his reputation. Four of Mr Carmichael's constituents are behind a court bid to oust him from his seat - brought under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which forbids people from making false statements about the character and conduct of an election candidate. It comes after he admitted responsibility for the leaked memo written by a civil servant, which incorrectly claimed First Minister Nicola Sturgeon told the French ambassador that she would prefer to see David Cameron remain in Downing Street at May's general election. The MP initially denied having prior knowledge of the memo leak, but following a Cabinet Office inquiry he later admitted he had allowed his special adviser Euan Roddin to release details of the document, which appeared in the Daily Telegraph towards the start of the election campaign on April 3. Questioned by his own counsel Roddy Dunlop QC, Mr Carmichael, a married father-of-two, told the court it has been "a difficult few months'' for him. "Do you regret getting involved in this in the first place?'' asked the lawyer. "Enormously,'' Mr Carmichael replied. Earlier, the court heard Mr Carmichael's claim in an April Channel 4 interviewthat he had no prior knowledge of the leak was "false''. Mr Carmichael told Jonathan Mitchell QC, acting for the four petitioners, that he had initially denied knowledge of the leak to protect Mr Roddin and the interests of his party. "We were still wanting to keep the focus on the story and not on the leak,'' he told the court. The MP agreed the focus would have moved to him if he had initially admitted knowledge of the memo leak. Mr Mitchell suggested that would have been "destructive'' of his reputation, but Mr Carmichael insisted: "It was nothing about my reputation.'' The QC continued: "You're assuring the court this is nothing to do with protecting your reputation?'' Mr Carmichael replied: "The question of my reputation was not the consideration that we had. This was about keeping the focus on the political story, the purpose of the leak in the first place.'' On Monday, Mr Carmichael told the court he was "less than fully truthful'' with the Cabinet Office inquiry initially, which was launched shortly after the newspaper article was printed. Mr Mitchell today suggested the MP's approach to the probe was "calculated and intended to mislead''. Mr Carmichael replied: "Yes, I would have to accept that.''