Briana Jungwirth responds to ‘sick’ conspiracy theory about her baby being ‘fake’
Briana has blasted the theory
Briana Jungwirth has responded to claims her baby son is a fake, calling the conspiracy ‘sick and morally wrong’.
After news broke of the ‘Babygate’ story , the world was left wondering if the One Direction man’s baby was all a made up story.
Some eagle eyed One Direction fans created an odd conspiracy theory which suggests Freddie is either a doll or does not exist at all.
The theory stems on the long running conspiracy that Louis and his band mate, Harry Styles, are actually in a relationship together. Despite both boys denying this rumour on a number of occasions some fans believe the star is using the whole baby story as a cover up.
However proud mother, Briana, has now slammed the false claims in an Instagram comment reading, ‘Sorry but that is just cruel. I don’t usually speak out much, but I’d like to know how you would feel as a new proud mother reading something like this? How dare anyone call my child fake. That’s sick and morally wrong. Say all you’d like but I won’t I won’t let anyone take away the happiness I have for my baby son. I know Louis wont either’
The One Direction man also seemed to respond to the harsh reports by uploading a new picture little Freddie with a soft football.
The theory goes all the way back to May 2015 when a Twitter account called @Brianafacts was set up before there was any public knowledge of the pair dating. However, fans believed it was Louis' management who set this up knowing they pair were going to be photographed by the press only a few days later.
The theory then continued when Freddie entered the world in January. Fans noticed the dates that both Louis and Briana uploaded their announcement messages did not coincide with each other.
Briana posted a pic welcoming Freddie into the world on the 21st January, whereas Louis didn’t tweet until the 23rd with the caption ‘yesterday’.
The most recent uproar was caused by the photo of Freddie’s feet Briana uploaded. The argument was that no two-month-old babies are able to spread their toes like that and the angle of the feet look unnatural.
Read the ‘Babygate’ conspiracy in full here.
It seems both parents have put the record straight!