Only part of Prince Harry's claim against the Sun can go to the High Court
A Judge ruled that part of the Duke of Sussex's case can go to the High Court
Last updated 27th Jul 2023
A judge has ruled that part of Prince Harry's claim of damages against The Sun can be heard in the High Court, but not in relation to phone hacking.
Mr Justice Fancourt ruled on Thursday that the Duke of Sussex's claim over allegations of unlawful information gathering, such as the use of private investigators, could be tried and will go ahead to a trial in January.
But the judge also ruled the Duke can not bring his claim against News Group Newspapers (NGN), publisher of The Sun and now-defunct News Of The World, in relation to phone hacking.
The judge also refused to allow the duke to rely on an alleged “secret agreement” between the royal family and senior executives working for media mogul Rupert Murdoch as part of his claim.
News Group Newspapers claim victory
A spokesperson for NGN said after the ruling: “The High Court has today, in a significant victory for News Group Newspapers, dismissed The Duke of Sussex’s phone hacking claims against both the News Of The World and The Sun.
“As we reach the tail end of litigation, NGN is drawing a line under disputed matters, some of which date back more than 20 years ago.
“In arguing his case, the Duke of Sussex had alleged a ‘secret agreement’ existed between him/Buckingham Palace and NGN which stopped NGN from asserting that the duke’s claim had been brought too late.
“The Judge, Mr Justice Fancourt, found his claims in relation to the alleged ‘secret agreement’ were not plausible or credible. It is quite clear there was never any such agreement and it is only the Duke who has ever asserted there was.
“Mr Justice Fancourt then dismissed the duke’s phone hacking claims against both the News Of The World and The Sun on the grounds that the claim had been brought too late.
“This substantially reduces the scope of his legal claim. The exact nature and scope of any trial of the remainder will be the subject of further hearings.”