Daniel Morgan murder: The Metropolitan Police accused of institutional corruption

A report into the murder of a private detective in 1987 has called on the Metropolitan Police to apologise to his family.

The force has been accused of a "form of institutional corruption" in the way it handled the investigation into Daniel Morgan's death. No one's ever been convicted of killing the father-of-two.

In a statement through their lawyer, the family of Mr Morgan said:

We welcome the recognition that we - and the public at large - have been failed over the decades by a culture of corruption and cover up in the Metropolitan Police, an institutionalised corruption that has permeated successive regimes in the Metropolitan Police and beyond to this day.''

The report, which runs to more than 1,200 pages, expressed concern that within the Met a culture still exists that inhibits both organisational and individual accountability''. It found:

The family of Daniel Morgan suffered grievously as a consequence of the failure to bring his family to justice, the unwarranted assurances which they were given, the misinformation which was put into the public domain, and the denial of failings in investigation, including failing to acknowledge professional competence, individuals' venal behaviour, and managerial and organisational failures.

The Metropolitan Police also repeatedly failed to take a fresh, thorough and critical look at past failings.

Concealing or denying failings, for the sake of the organisation's public image, is dishonesty on the part of the organisation for reputational benefit and constitutes a form of institutional corruption.''

The initial investigation into Mr Morgan's death was heavily criticised, with the murder scene not searched and left unguarded, and no alibis sought for all the suspects.

A later probe by Hampshire Police, brought in to investigate amid fears of corruption, was compromised when a senior Met officer was appointed to work with the team, the report said.

The current Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick was criticised for her refusal to allow the panel team access to the HOLMES police data system. The report said:

The Metropolitan Police's lack of candour manifested itself in the hurdles placed in the path of the Panel, such as (then Assistant Commissioner) Cressida Dick's initial refusal to recognise the necessity for the Panel to have access to the HOLMES system.''

Daniel Morgan's brother Alastair Morgan told reporters Dame Cressida should absolutely'' be considering her position in light of the report. The family's solicitor Raju Bhatt said:

You heard from the panel that the institutionalised corruption that they found is a current problem in the present tense. The current leadership in the Met has to take responsibility for that continuing.''

Downing Street later said Prime Minister Boris Johnson still has confidence in the Met Commissioner.

Home Secretary Priti Patel described the Morgan case as one of the most devastating episodes in the history of the Metropolitan Police''. She said she has asked Dame Cressida for adetailed response'' to the panel's recommendations and the wider issues outlined in the report, adding that there were questions about the ability of the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) watchdog to hold police to account.

As a result she has decided to bring forward a review of the IOPC to start this summer looking at its effectiveness and efficiency.

The Met said in a brief statement: We deeply regret our failure to bring those who murdered Daniel Morgan to justice'', adding that the force was considering the report and wouldrespond in more detail'' later on Tuesday

Hear all the latest news from across the UK on the hour, every hour, on Greatest Hits Radio on DAB, smartspeaker, at greatesthitsradio.co.uk, and on the Rayo app.