Newark tree protestors vow to keep up their campaign after land fenced off
Four trees are due to be chopped down
Campaigners against the felling of 4 trees in Newark say they won't be deterred as the area's fenced off.
Private land signs have also been put up at the site in London Road - warning protestors they're trespassing - but they're refusing to give in.
They wouldn't leave the area yesterday.
Christina Stephenson from the Stop the Chop group said:
"My message to the Council would be, to do the right thing, give this space back to the people of Newark to enjoy for generations to come."
"You must know this decision is wrong".
There was a stand off between the protestors and contractors.
Some protesters eventually left, but others continued to refuse to move.
The council is in a legally binding agreement with a developer who owns the land to build the car park extension – and claims that reversing its decision to chop the trees would cost the taxpayer £1m.
Campaigner Nadia Ming, who was at the site while the fence was put up this morning, said: “It’s just too much to see, too much to bear.
“This was such precious piece of land in the middle of the town with its trees and wildlife. It is going to be stripped bare.”
A representative of Protect Newark’s Green Spaces and Extinction Rebellion told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: “We got there at around 6.45am this morning as a red alert had been put out by the group.
“There were around 50-70 people there to begin with. The police arrived and so did a lot of contractors from Newark and Sherwood District Council.
“The council started to chainsaw a hedge to put a gate in for the security fencing. It was so loud and chaotic, feelings were running very high.
“Everybody is heartbroken, they feel so passionately about it.
“The council said they aren’t doing any more work on site today but they will be arresting people if they don’t leave.
“These are very ordinary and very concerned people of Newark.”
It comes after protesters were warned about trespassing by visiting the site as the council stressed that it is “private land and not public open space”.
The council confirmed its plan to fell the trees in a statement last week – but said it was a “tough decision” to make.
Deputy Leader of the Council Keith Girling (Con) said in October: “This is not a situation wanted to get into, but we’re in a legally binding contract now.
“The cost of getting out of that contract is far too much.
“As a council, we’ve got to do what we think is right, yes there were mistakes made and we aren’t trying to deny that.
“We will move on from them and make sure they don’t happen again.”