Councillors back lower speed limits in Harrogate and Knaresborough
But some are concerned about costs and enforcement
A campaign for speed limits to be reduced from 30mph to 20mph has been backed by Harrogate and Knaresborough councillors who have called for the changes to be piloted in larger areas.
The slower limits were described as a “popular” way to make roads safer at a meeting of North Yorkshire County Council’s Harrogate and Knaresborough Area Constituency Committee today.
However, not everyone is in support of the ’20s plenty’ campaign, with some councillors raising questions over enforcement and the costs involved.
The area committee voted nine for, two against and with one abstention in their calls for the county council’s executive to agree to test out 20mph limits in towns and villages.
But the authority is already standing firm in its belief that the lower speed limits work best in a more targeted approach, such as outside schools.
Allan McVeigh, head of network strategy at the county council, told today’s meeting that 20mph limits should only be introduced where they are “appropriate for that part of the network”.
He said: “The county council is committed to making the network safe and accessible for all road users, and will continue to engage with local communities
“Introducing a 20mph speed limit or zone to a road where drivers do not already conform to lower speeds will likely result in poor compliance and consequently understandable local complaints.”
Mr McVeigh said the costs of introducing lower speed limits across the Harrogate and Knaresborough area would exceed £1 million, although he added this could be more as roads where drivers regularly exceed 24mph would require more measures than just signage and road markings.
These extra measures could involve speed bumps and chicanes which councillors admitted are not always popular.
Across North Yorkshire, more than 100 parishes have voted for default 20mph speed limits across built-up areas and campaign supporter Malcolm Margolis said that targeting schools only “achieves little or nothing”.
He told councillors: “People need to be able to walk and cycle safely from home to school, and to friends, relatives, play areas and other destinations.
“The 30mph limit was introduced in 1935 to tackle a spate of road casualties – I hope you agree it is no longer fit for purpose.
“Please support the default 20mph to make our communities safer and better places to live.”
Ouseburn councillor Arnold Warneken also said it is “inadequate” to have the lower speed limits on just some streets and that questions over enforcement are a “smokescreen” for not introducing the changes on a wider basis.
He said: “The same problems exist whether you are enforcing 30mph or 20mph.
“There are problems, I acknowledge that, but I don’t think we should let that stand in the way of doing what is right.”
Earlier this year, the county council’s executive approved a policy to introduce 20mph speed limits on a “targeted, evidence-based approach”. This followed a review by the authority’s Transport, Economy and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee which will revisit the issue in January.