Alister Jack insists next election won't be a de facto independence referendum

The Scottish Secretary says "general elections aren't for that purpose"

Author: Finlay JackPublished 7th Jul 2022

Alister Jack insists that the next general election won't be a de facto independence referendum.

Mr Jack says "general elections aren't for that purpose", when asked what would happen if the SNP gained more than 50% of the vote at the next election.

Despite this, Nicola Sturgeon still commits to fighting the next election on the single issue of independence, should the Supreme Court rule that she can't hold a referendum without Westminster's backing.

While speaking to journalists on Wednesday, Mr Jack was asked if the UK Government would have to authorise a second independence referendum if the SNP took most of the vote in Scottish seats.

He said: "General elections aren't for that purpose.

"General elections are about a myriad of issues, as we know, and Nicola Sturgeon can no more put in her manifesto that she's going to remove Trident from the Clyde which is entirely reserved - which she's done in the past but she's never removed Trident from the Clyde - than she can put in her manifesto she's going to break up the United Kingdom.

"That isn't how general elections work and if the Supreme Court has already said that's out of scope I think people will draw their own conclusions."

The Scottish Secretary was also asked about the Scottish Government's legal "reference" of its own independence referendum legislation to the Supreme Court.

In her submission to the court, the Scottish Government's Lord Advocate asked judges to rule on whether their proposed Bill was within the Scottish Parliament's powers.

The Lord Advocate said she "does not have the necessary degree of confidence" on the issue of the Bill's competence.

Commenting on this, Mr Jack said: "I'm not surprised by that, because the Scotland Act is crystal clear.

"My Advocate General for Scotland, the current one and the previous one, Lord Keen, were always very clear to me that the constitution was wholly reserved - there's an emphasis on the word wholly there - to the Parliament in Westminster.

"So it doesn't come as any great surprise to me that the Lord Advocate's taken that position."

Hear the latest news on Clyde 1 on FM, DAB, smart speaker or the Rayo app.